10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Falken (48%). In this particular case, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P has a better rating of 97% compared to 66% of the Falken EuroWinter HS01. The first tyre test of Continental WinterContact TS 870 P was done in 2021, compared to 2017 when was the Falken EuroWinter HS01 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the WinterContact TS 870 P and the EuroWinter HS01 were tested. See more mutual tests below. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WinterContact TS 870 P is made in Czech Republic and EuroWinter HS01 is made in Turkey.

#	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /97%	Falken EuroWinter HS01 /66%

Dimensions	R16 - R22	R13 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 166

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 83

Number of tests

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 23x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 15x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 5.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 8.

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 30.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.33

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 11.04

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2023

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 2022

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Good

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
79%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01
78%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 78%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 92%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 70%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 84%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 80%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 89%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 84%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 84%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 61%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
85%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01
58%

Snow traction

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 83%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 59%

Snow braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 89%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 71%

Snow handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 86%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 64%

Snow cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 83%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 67%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
89%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01
83%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 87%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 78%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 85%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 83%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
81%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01
75%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 83%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 70%

Comfort

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 74%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 69%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 ? dB

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ? dB

Costs

(Overall rating)

Falken
EuroWinter HS01
65%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
59%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 93%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 44%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	34,6	25,5
Falken EuroWinter HS01	36,3	25,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Good	2+	2+	1-	3
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	2-	2-	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 245/40 R19

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2+
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	2	2	2
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2022 245/45 R19

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	9,3	9,4	10	10	10
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Very good	7,5	9,4	8,3	10	8
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Sufficient	8,3	8,2	4,3	4	6
Show test details

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands