18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /93%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 /99%	Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ /87%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%

Dimensions	R16 - R22	R14 - R18	R0 - R21	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premium

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 97

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 17x

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 3x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.

Worst position in test

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 5.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.71

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.33

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 2025

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Very good

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Good

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Good

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Good

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Good

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

94%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

92%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

81%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 76%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 75%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 80%

Snow handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 65%

Snow cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 78%

Lateral guidance on snow

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 100%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 100%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 87%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Snow performance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 88%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 85%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

88%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

79%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 76%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 66%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 81%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ B

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

88%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

83%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 87%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Dry lane changing

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 95%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 87%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Dry steering response

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 89%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Dry performance

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 78%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 59%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

87%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

79%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

70%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

Comfort

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 75%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 74%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Interior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 98%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 80%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

80%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

74%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

63%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 92%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

Mileage

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 37%

Price/value

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 68%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 49%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ C

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Offroad

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

77%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

0%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

0%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

0%

Ice

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

85%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

0%

Ice braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P -27%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands