12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 860S vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). But when it comes to comparing Continental WinterContact TS 860S and Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Continental WinterContact TS 860S was done in 2019, compared to 2015 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 255/35 R19 test, where both the WinterContact TS 860S and the Winter i*cept evo2 W320 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 75% of Continental WinterContact TS 860S dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (85%) of the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 also have C wet ratings.

#	Continental WinterContact TS 860S /0%	Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 /0%

Dimensions	R16 - R22	R15 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860S Premium

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Premium

Number of sizes available

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 124

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 97

Number of tests

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 9x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 2x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 3.

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 5.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 4.

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 20.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 3.5

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 7.44

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 2020

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 2019

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860S Good

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860S Good

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Still recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

73%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860S

60%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 79%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 50%

Wet braking

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 76%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 57%

Wet handling

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 73%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 60%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 65%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 62%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 80%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 75%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860S C

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 C

Snow

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

88%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860S

75%

Snow handling

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 85%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 80%

Snow traction

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 88%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 83%

Snow braking

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 82%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 82%

Snow cornering

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 87%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 69%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860S

86%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

84%

Dry braking

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 75%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 74%

Dry handling

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 86%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 83%

Ice

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

82%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860S

76%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

84%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860S

74%

Exterior noise

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 82%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 77%

Comfort

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 86%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 71%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 ?

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860S

88%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

65%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 88%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 65%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860S C

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 E

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 255/35 R19

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	1-	2	1-
Continental WinterContact TS 860S Rating: Good	2-	2	2+
Hankook Winter icept evo2 W320 Rating: Good*	2	2-	2+
Show test details

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 860S vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands