12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Nokian WR D4 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Continental WinterContact TS 860 /0%	Nokian WR D4 /0%	Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%

Dimensions	R13 - R17	R13 - R20	R13 - R17	R14 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Premium

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

4. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88

3. Nokian WR D4 82

4. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76

Number of tests

1. Nokian WR D4 26x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 21x

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

2. Nokian WR D4 2.

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. Nokian WR D4 14.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 20.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. Nokian WR D4 6.04

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 7.1

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2020

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

4. Nokian WR D4 2018

Best rating in test

1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

3. Nokian WR D4 Recommended

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

84%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

82%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

81%

Nokian
WR D4

78%

Dry braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 87%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 84%

3. Nokian WR D4 80%

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 77%

Dry handling

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 86%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 85%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

4. Nokian WR D4 78%

Dry driving behavior

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 79%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76%

3. Nokian WR D4 71%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Dry performance

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 80%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 80%

3. Nokian WR D4 75%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

90%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

82%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Nokian
WR D4

71%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 90%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 82%

3. Nokian WR D4 69%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 60%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 87%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 85%

3. Nokian WR D4 74%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 90%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 88%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

4. Nokian WR D4 76%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 88%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 73%

3. Nokian WR D4 71%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 94%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 90%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 83%

4. Nokian WR D4 69%

Wet performance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 91%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 79%

3. Nokian WR D4 69%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 B

2. Nokian WR D4 B

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 C

Snow

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR D4

92%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

88%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

85%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Snow traction

1. Nokian WR D4 92%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 84%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

Snow braking

1. Nokian WR D4 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 89%

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 82%

Snow handling

1. Nokian WR D4 93%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 86%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 86%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

Snow cornering

1. Nokian WR D4 94%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 89%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 84%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Snow performance

1. Nokian WR D4 90%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 88%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 74%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

82%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

75%

Nokian
WR D4

71%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

70%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 72%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

4. Nokian WR D4 71%

Interior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 74%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 70%

3. Nokian WR D4 66%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Comfort

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 96%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 83%

3. Nokian WR D4 71%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 ?

4. Nokian WR D4 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR D4

83%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

78%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

78%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

74%

Mileage

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 80%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 75%

3. Nokian WR D4 68%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Rolling resistance

1. Nokian WR D4 99%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 59%

Fuel efficiency

1. Nokian WR D4 88%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 76%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Price/value

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 97%

2. Nokian WR D4 79%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 860 68%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Nokian WR D4 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 C

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR D4

84%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

80%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

78%

Ice lateral guidance

1. Nokian WR D4 82%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 76%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Ice braking

1. Nokian WR D4 85%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 84%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 80%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 16 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2019 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	2,1	1,9	2,2	2,6	1,5	1,6
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Recommended	1,8	2,5	2,2	2,6	2,6	2,5	1,9
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Recommended	2,9	3,1	2,0	2,3	2,9	3,0	1,7
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Recommended*	2,1	2,5	2,5	2,6	2,9	2,0	2,6
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2018 205/55 R16

Name	Points total
Best values in test	9,1
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Highly recommended	9,1
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Recommended	8,1
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Recommended*	8,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1	1
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2	2
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory	3	2-	1	2
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Good*	2	2	1-	1-
Show test details

ACE Winter tyre test 2018 185/65 R15

Name	Points total	Winter	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise	Running costs
Best values in test	206	67	68	43	19	8	10
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Test winner	206	66	68	43	16	7	6
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Recommended	195	65	58	40	19	6	7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Recommended	182	58	53	43	15	6	7
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2018 175/65 R14

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,7	2,0	1,8	2,4	3,2	1,5	1,6
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Good	1,7	2,3	1,8	2,5	3,5	2,0	2,2
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory	2,4	2,6	2,7	2,4	3,8	2,0	2,2
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2018 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,1	2,0	1,8	2,3	3,0	1,0	1,7
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Good	2,1	2,5	1,9	2,5	3,0	2,0	1,7
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory	2,9	2,5	1,8	2,5	3,4	3,0	1,7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,5	27,6
Nokian WR D4	37,3	27,6
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	34,9	27,7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	2+	2-
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory	2	2-	2	3+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	1-	2-	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Continental WinterContact TS 860	33,5	27,5
Nokian WR D4	35	27,7
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	35,9	28,6
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	32,5	28,7
Show test details

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2017 225/45 R17

Name	Points total
Best values in test	100
Continental WinterContact TS 860	100
Nokian WR D4	98
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	99,8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	96,9
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2017 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	1,7	1,7	2,1	3,0	1,5	1,7
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Good	1,8	2,2	1,9	2,5	3,4	2,5	1,9
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory	3,1	2,3	1,7	2,4	3,6	3,0	1,9
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Satisfactory*	2,6	2,2	2,7	2,5	3,7	2,5	2,2
Show test details

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	100	96,9	99,8	99	100	100
Continental WinterContact TS 860	100	94,6	99,8	96,2	100	100
Nokian WR D4	99,7	96,9	99,5	99	85,1	97,9
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	97,6	92,1	99,6	95,9	86,1	99,1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	98,4	95,6	96	94,9	85,6	99,8
Show test details

Autoklub ČR Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	101	100	103,3	100,3
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Very good	101	99,5	103,3	100,3
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Good	99,3	97,4	100,5	99,9
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Satisfactory*	96,2	90,3	99,4	98,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	98,6	98,3	98,9	98,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2	2+	1
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: -	1-	2	2+	1
Nokian WR D4 Rating: -	2	2-	2+	2-
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: -	2-	2	2	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,2	25,6
Nokian WR D4	37,3	26,0
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	39,1	26,2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	38,5	25,9
Show test details

GTÜ Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	412	142	127	143	25	10
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Highly recommended	412	142	127	143	25	9
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Highly recommended	387	124	121	142	21	8
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Highly recommended*	363	104	118	141	16	10
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Recommended	341	100	114	127	19	8
Show test details

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Nokian WR D4 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands