18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Continental WinterContact TS 860 /0%	GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 /95%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%

Dimensions	R13 - R17	R14 - R22	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Premium

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 265

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76

Number of tests

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 24x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 1.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 9.

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2.67

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2025

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

Best rating in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Test winner

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Recommended

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

82%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 82%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 72%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 91%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 82%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Dry driving behavior

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 100%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 73%

Dry performance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 80%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

Dry steering response

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 85%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

Dry lane changing

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 80%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 77%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

91%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 85%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 90%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 89%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 90%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 86%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 94%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 91%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Wet performance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 91%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 B

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 B

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

90%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 88%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 90%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 77%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 62%

Snow cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 93%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

Snow performance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 88%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 80%

Interior noise

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 77%

Comfort

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 90%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 73%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

66%

Mileage

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 77%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 82%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 75%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

Fuel efficiency

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 0%

Price/value

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 68%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 68%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 C

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 C

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

0%

Ice braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 82%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 -27%

Ice lateral guidance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands