12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 vs. Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Continental WinterContact TS 860 /0%	Goodyear UltraGrip 9 /0%	Michelin Alpin 5 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%

Dimensions	R13 - R17	R14 - R16	R15 - R21	R14 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Premium

3. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

2. Michelin Alpin 5 91

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76

4. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 41

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 17x

3. Michelin Alpin 5 17x

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 1.

3. Michelin Alpin 5 2.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 9.

3. Michelin Alpin 5 17.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 3.65

3. Michelin Alpin 5 5.88

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 2020

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

4. Michelin Alpin 5 2018

Best rating in test

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Highly recommended

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

3. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

Worst rating in test

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Good

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

4. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended

Dry

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Alpin 5

86%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

84%

Goodyear
UltraGrip 9

82%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

82%

Dry braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 87%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 84%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 79%

4. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 76%

Dry handling

1. Michelin Alpin 5 87%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 85%

3. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 81%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

Dry driving behavior

1. Michelin Alpin 5 89%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76%

3. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 76%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Dry performance

1. Michelin Alpin 5 86%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 80%

3. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 79%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

90%

Goodyear
UltraGrip 9

88%

Michelin
Alpin 5

79%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 88%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 88%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 86%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 90%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 84%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 73%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 60%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 89%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 85%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 83%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 88%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 84%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 76%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 94%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 90%

3. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 87%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 78%

Wet performance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 91%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 87%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 79%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 B

2. Michelin Alpin 5 B

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

4. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 C

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

88%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Goodyear
UltraGrip 9

77%

Michelin
Alpin 5

69%

Snow traction

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 87%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 68%

Snow braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 89%

3. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 86%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 76%

Snow handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 71%

4. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 69%

Snow cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 89%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 74%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 71%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Snow performance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 88%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 72%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 59%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

82%

Goodyear
UltraGrip 9

77%

Michelin
Alpin 5

74%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

70%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

3. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 70%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 64%

Interior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 74%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 70%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 70%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Comfort

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 96%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 88%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 87%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 68 dB

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

4. Michelin Alpin 5 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Alpin 5

83%

Goodyear
UltraGrip 9

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

78%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

74%

Mileage

1. Michelin Alpin 5 94%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 80%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 75%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Rolling resistance

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 82%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 68%

Fuel efficiency

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 85%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 74%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Price/value

1. Michelin Alpin 5 97%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 74%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 860 68%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 C

3. Michelin Alpin 5 E

4. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
UltraGrip 9

82%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

80%

Michelin
Alpin 5

78%

Ice braking

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 85%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 84%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 81%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Ice lateral guidance

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 78%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 76%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 13 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Használtautó.hu Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on ice
Best values in test	13,9	14,8	16,4
Continental WinterContact TS 860	15,4	16,4	21,7
Goodyear UltraGrip 9	15,3	15,8	18,5
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2019 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	2,1	1,9	2,2	2,6	1,5	1,6
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Recommended	1,8	2,5	2,2	2,6	2,6	2,5	1,9
Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: Recommended	1,9	2,5	3,1	2,5	2,7	2,5	2,2
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2018 205/55 R16

Name	Points total
Best values in test	9,1
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Highly recommended	9,1
Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: Recommended	8,2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1	1
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2	2
Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: Good	2	2-	1	2
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Satisfactory	2	2	3	1
Show test details

ACE Winter tyre test 2018 185/65 R15

Name	Points total	Winter	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise	Running costs
Best values in test	206	67	68	43	19	8	10
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Test winner	206	66	68	43	16	7	6
Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: Recommended	191	57	68	40	17	3	6
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Recommended	182	58	53	43	15	6	7
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2018 175/65 R14

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,7	2,0	1,8	2,4	3,2	1,5	1,6
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Good	1,7	2,3	1,8	2,5	3,5	2,0	2,2
Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: Satisfactory	2,2	2,6	2,8	2,5	3,5	1,5	1,8
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2018 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,1	2,0	1,8	2,3	3,0	1,0	1,7
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Good	2,1	2,5	1,9	2,5	3,0	2,0	1,7
Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: Good	2,1	2,3	2,0	2,5	3,3	2,0	1,8
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Satisfactory	2,4	2,0	2,7	2,5	3,6	1,0	2,4
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,5	27,6
Goodyear UltraGrip 9	35,5	27
Michelin Alpin 5	37,1	28,4
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2017 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	1,7	1,7	2,1	3,0	1,5	1,7
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Good	1,8	2,2	1,9	2,5	3,4	2,5	1,9
Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: Satisfactory	1,9	2,4	2,7	2,4	3,1	2,0	2,1
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Satisfactory	2,5	2,1	3,2	2,6	3,5	1,5	2,6
Show test details

Autoklub ČR Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	101	100	103,3	100,3
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Very good	101	99,5	103,3	100,3
Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: Good	99,1	97,8	100	99,5
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Very good	100	100	100	100
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	98,6	98,3	98,9	98,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2	2+	1
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: -	1-	2	2+	1
Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: -	2+	2	2+	2-
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: -	2+	2	1-	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,2	25,6
Goodyear UltraGrip 9	36,1	25
Michelin Alpin 5	35,6	25,8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	38,5	25,9
Show test details

GTÜ Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	412	142	127	143	25	10
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Highly recommended	412	142	127	143	25	9
Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: Highly recommended	376	127	117	132	22	9
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Highly recommended	376	128	108	140	18	8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Recommended	341	100	114	127	19	8
Show test details

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 vs. Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands