Segment
2. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Premium
Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Dunlop). Dunlop is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (96%) than Dunlop (71%). The first tyre test of Continental WinterContact TS 860 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2021 195/65 R15 test, where both the WinterContact TS 860 and the SP Winter Response 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Continental WinterContact TS 860 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (90%) of the Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 also have B wet ratings. We also know where WinterContact TS 860 is made - Portugal/Slovakia.
| # | Continental WinterContact TS 860
| Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R14 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Highly recommended2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good
Worst rating in test
2. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Sufficient
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry driving behavior
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
Ice lateral guidance
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,9 | 2,0 | 2,6 | 2,0 | |
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Satisfactory | 1,6 | 2,7 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 2,9 | 2,5 | |
| Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 2,0 | 2,0 | 2,4 | 3,0 | 2,5 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,1 | 1,9 | 2,2 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Recommended | 1,8 | 2,5 | 2,2 | 2,6 | 2,6 | 2,5 | 1,9 |
| Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Rating: Highly recommended | 1,9 | 2,3 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 1,6 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Running costs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 206 | 67 | 68 | 43 | 19 | 8 | 10 |
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Test winner | 206 | 66 | 68 | 43 | 16 | 7 | 6 |
| Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Rating: Recommended | 186 | 62 | 57 | 39 | 16 | 6 | 6 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Good | 1,7 | 2,3 | 1,8 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 2,0 | 2,2 |
| Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Rating: Good | 1,8 | 2,4 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 3,4 | 2,0 | 1,7 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,7 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 3,0 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Good | 1,8 | 2,2 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 1,9 |
| Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,0 | 2,6 | 2,1 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 2,5 | 1,8 |
| Show test details | |||||||
