18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Continental WinterContact TS 860 /0%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 /99%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ /87%

Dimensions	R13 - R17	R14 - R18	R14 - R19	R0 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premium

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 97

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

4. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 17x

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 3x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.

Worst position in test

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 5.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.71

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.33

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 2025

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

4. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Very good

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Good

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Good

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Good

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

88%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

82%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 82%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 91%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Dry driving behavior

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 78%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 73%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Dry performance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 80%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 78%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

Dry lane changing

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 95%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

91%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

88%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 90%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 89%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 85%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 66%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 90%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 81%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 94%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Wet performance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 91%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 82%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 B

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ B

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

90%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

90%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 88%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 76%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 90%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 80%

Snow handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

Snow cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 78%

Snow performance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 88%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 88%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

90%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

70%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 80%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

Interior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 98%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 77%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Comfort

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 90%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 68%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

74%

Mileage

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 77%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 82%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

Fuel efficiency

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Price/value

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 68%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 68%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ C

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 C

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

85%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

0%

Ice braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 82%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Ice lateral guidance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands