12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Continental WinterContact TS 860 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 /81%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 /99%

Dimensions	R13 - R17	R14 - R22	R14 - R17	R14 - R18
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Premium

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premium

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 78

4. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 17x

4. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 14x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

4. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 2.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 14.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.71

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

4. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 5.5

Year of the last test

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 2025

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

4. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

Best rating in test

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Highly recommended

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Very good

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Good

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Good

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

89.4%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

87%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

83.5%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

80%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 88%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

4. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 0%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

92%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

90%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

86.8%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

83.7%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 94%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

4. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 0%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 85%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

4. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 0%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 96%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

4. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 0%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 92%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 88%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

4. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 0%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 94%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 91%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

4. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 B

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

4. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 B

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

90%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

90.2%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

81.3%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

76%

Snow traction

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 83%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 78%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

4. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 0%

Snow braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

4. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 0%

Snow handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 92%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 61%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

4. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

89.5%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

80%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

77.2%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

74%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 73%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

4. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

4. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

84.1%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

81%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

73.5%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 C

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

4. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 C

Ice

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

84.5%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

76%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2021 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,6	1,9	1,5	2,1	2,7	1,5
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Satisfactory	1,9	3,0	2,1	2,2	3,0	2,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	1,6	1,9	2,8	2,4	3,3	3,0
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2021 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,6	1,9	1,9	2,0	2,6	2,0
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Satisfactory	1,6	2,7	1,9	2,5	2,9	2,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	1,7	2,5	2,8	2,3	3,3	3,0
Show test details

Használtautó.hu Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on ice
Best values in test	13,9	14,8	16,4
Continental WinterContact TS 860	15,4	16,4	21,7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	15,4	16,4	21,7
Show test details

ACE Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	200	67	48	60	18	9
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Recommended	192	63	48	52	18	7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended	200	64	47	60	17	7
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,3	2,0	1,8	2,1	2,5	1,0	1,8
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Satisfactory	1,8	3,0	2,0	2,2	2,5	2,5	2,2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1,3	2,1	2,1	2,4	2,9	2,5	2,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	1-	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Continental WinterContact TS 860	31,5	24,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	29,2	24,6
Show test details

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands