Segment
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (96%) than Bridgestone (93%). The first tyre test of Continental WinterContact TS 860 was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2021 225/50 R17 test, where both the WinterContact TS 860 and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Continental WinterContact TS 860 has B wet grip rating, whereas 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WinterContact TS 860 is made in Portugal/Slovakia and Blizzak LM-005 is made in Italy/Hungary/Poland.
# | Continental WinterContact TS 860
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R14 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium
1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 1,5 | |
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Satisfactory | 1,9 | 3,0 | 2,1 | 2,2 | 3,0 | 2,5 | |
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | 1,6 | 1,9 | 2,8 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 3,0 | |
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,9 | 2,0 | 2,6 | 2,0 | |
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Satisfactory | 1,6 | 2,7 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 2,9 | 2,5 | |
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | 1,7 | 2,5 | 2,8 | 2,3 | 3,3 | 3,0 | |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on ice | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 13,9 | 14,8 | 16,4 | ||||
Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 15,4 | 16,4 | 21,7 | ||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 15,4 | 16,4 | 21,7 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 200 | 67 | 48 | 60 | 18 | 9 | |
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Recommended | 192 | 63 | 48 | 52 | 18 | 7 | |
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended | 200 | 64 | 47 | 60 | 17 | 7 | |
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,3 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,1 | 2,5 | 1,0 | 1,8 |
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Satisfactory | 1,8 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 1,3 | 2,1 | 2,1 | 2,4 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | |||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 31,5 | 24,5 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 29,2 | 24,6 | |||||
Show test details |