Segment
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium3. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium4. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Premium
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium3. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium4. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Premium
2. Michelin Alpin 5 5.88
1. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Exemplary2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good3. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good
3. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended4. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Still recommended
These tyres were tested together in 9 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Running costs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 206 | 67 | 68 | 43 | 19 | 8 | 10 |
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Test winner | 206 | 66 | 68 | 43 | 16 | 7 | 6 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Recommended | 182 | 58 | 53 | 43 | 15 | 6 | 7 |
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good | 1- | 2- | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 1- | 2 | 3+ | 3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 33,5 | 27,5 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 32,5 | 28,7 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 33,3 | 28,7 | |||||
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 | 32,2 | 29,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | ||||||
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 100 | ||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 96,9 | ||||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 97,5 | ||||||
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 | 97,9 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 96,9 | 99,8 | 99 | 100 | 100 | |
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 100 | 94,6 | 99,8 | 96,2 | 100 | 100 | |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 98,4 | 95,6 | 96 | 94,9 | 85,6 | 99,8 | |
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 98,5 | 88,2 | 97 | 98,8 | 88,7 | 98,4 | |
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 101 | 100 | 103,3 | 100,3 | |||
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Very good | 101 | 99,5 | 103,3 | 100,3 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good | 98,6 | 98,3 | 98,9 | 98,6 | |||
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Very good | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 95,2 | 89,8 | 100,2 | 95,6 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: - | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2 | 3+ | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: - | 2+ | 2 | 1- | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 34,2 | 25,6 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 38,5 | 25,9 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 35,6 | 25,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 412 | 142 | 127 | 143 | 25 | 10 | |
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Highly recommended | 412 | 142 | 127 | 143 | 25 | 9 | |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Recommended | 341 | 100 | 114 | 127 | 19 | 8 | |
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Highly recommended | 376 | 128 | 108 | 140 | 18 | 8 | |
| Show test details | |||||||