• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than BFGoodrich (75%). The first tyre test of Continental WinterContact TS 860 was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2021 195/65 R15 test, where both the WinterContact TS 860 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 99% of Continental WinterContact TS 860 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WinterContact TS 860 is made in Portugal/Slovakia and G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made in Romania/Poland.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
87%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Wet Braking
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Wet Handling
Continental WinterContact TS 860
94%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Wet Circle Cornering
Continental WinterContact TS 860
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
84%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Continental WinterContact TS 860
96%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Aquaplaning Cross
Continental WinterContact TS 860
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
92%
Best in category: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ (93.6%)
Dry Performance
Continental WinterContact TS 860
92%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
77%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Dry Braking
Continental WinterContact TS 860
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Dry Handling
Continental WinterContact TS 860
95%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Snow Performance
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
92%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Snow Braking
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
97%
Snow Traction
Continental WinterContact TS 860
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
97%
Snow Handling
Continental WinterContact TS 860
92%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
87%
Snow Circle Cornering
Continental WinterContact TS 860
97%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
87%
Best in category: Debica Frigo HP2 (93.3%)
Ice Performance
Continental WinterContact TS 860
76%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Ice Braking Abs
Continental WinterContact TS 860
76%
Ice Lateral Guidance
Continental WinterContact TS 860
76%
Best: Nokian WR Snowproof (91.0%)
Best in category: Michelin Alpin 6 (87.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Noise Exterior
Continental WinterContact TS 860
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
95%
Noise Interior
Continental WinterContact TS 860
76%
Best: Vredestein Wintrac (80.0%)
Ride Comfort
Continental WinterContact TS 860
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
84%
Best in category: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ (92.0%)
Economy
Continental WinterContact TS 860
88%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Rolling Resistance
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Best: Nokian WR Snowproof (97.0%)
Mileage
Continental WinterContact TS 860
89%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Best: Michelin Alpin 6 (100.0%)
Best in category: Michelin Alpin 6 (90.5%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison