18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental VanContact Winter vs. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER vs. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Continental VanContact Winter /0%	Pirelli CARRIER WINTER /0%	Michelin AGILIS ALPIN /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak W810 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R17	R14 - R17	R15 - R17	R14 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental VanContact Winter Premium

2. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER Premium

3. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 56

2. Continental VanContact Winter 46

3. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 36

4. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 23

Number of tests

1. Continental VanContact Winter 2x

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 2x

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 1x

4. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 1x

Best position in test

1. Continental VanContact Winter 1.

2. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 2.

3. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 3.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 7.

Worst position in test

1. Continental VanContact Winter 1.

2. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 2.

3. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 3.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 7.

Average position in tests

1. Continental VanContact Winter 1

2. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 2

3. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 3

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 7

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 2019

2. Continental VanContact Winter 2019

3. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 2019

4. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 2019

Best rating in test

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Recommended

2. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER Recommended

3. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended

Worst rating in test

1. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER Recommended

2. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended

3. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Still recommended

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended

Dry

(Overall rating)

Pirelli
CARRIER WINTER

81%

Continental
VanContact Winter

74%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

60%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

49%

Dry braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 78%

2. Continental VanContact Winter 72%

3. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 71%

4. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 61%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
VanContact Winter

88%

Pirelli
CARRIER WINTER

68%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

65%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

55%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental VanContact Winter 81%

2. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 67%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 67%

4. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 59%

Wet handling

1. Continental VanContact Winter 95%

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 69%

3. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 57%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 34%

Wet braking

1. Continental VanContact Winter 94%

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 75%

3. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 69%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 40%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 78%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 78%

3. Continental VanContact Winter 74%

4. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 67%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental VanContact Winter 92%

2. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 72%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 61%

4. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 61%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental VanContact Winter B

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN B

3. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER C

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 C

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
VanContact Winter

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

79%

Pirelli
CARRIER WINTER

75%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

74%

Snow traction

1. Continental VanContact Winter 92%

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 92%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 83%

4. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 83%

Snow braking

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 89%

2. Continental VanContact Winter 84%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 78%

4. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 78%

Snow handling

1. Continental VanContact Winter 82%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 76%

3. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 74%

4. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 64%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

75%

Continental
VanContact Winter

71%

Pirelli
CARRIER WINTER

63%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

56%

Interior noise

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 77%

2. Continental VanContact Winter 77%

3. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 71%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 67%

Exterior noise

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 81%

2. Continental VanContact Winter 65%

3. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 56%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 44%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 75 dB

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN ?

3. Continental VanContact Winter ?

4. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Pirelli
CARRIER WINTER

83%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

76%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

72%

Continental
VanContact Winter

63%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER C

2. Continental VanContact Winter C

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 E

4. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN E

Ice

(Overall rating)

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

84%

Pirelli
CARRIER WINTER

78%

Continental
VanContact Winter

74%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

74%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2019 205/65 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,4	2,3	2,2	2,3	2,5	2,0	1,6
Continental VanContact Winter Rating: Recommended	2,4	2,3	2,7	2,8	3,1	3,0	2,2
Pirelli CARRIER WINTER Rating: Recommended	3,3	2,4	2,8	2,7	3,4	2,5	1,9
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Recommended	2,9	3,4	2,5	2,4	3,2	2,0	2,0
Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Rating: Conditionally recommended	4,0	4,1	2,6	2,8	3,7	3,0	2,0
Show test details

Comparison: Continental VanContact Winter vs. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER vs. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands