Segment
1. Continental VanContact Winter Premium2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (96%) than Bridgestone (93%). But when it comes to comparing Continental VanContact Winter and Bridgestone Blizzak W810, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Continental VanContact Winter was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak W810 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the VanContact Winter and the Blizzak W810 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Continental VanContact Winter has B wet grip rating, whereas 76% of Bridgestone Blizzak W810 has C rating.
# | Continental VanContact Winter
| Bridgestone Blizzak W810
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental VanContact Winter Premium2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium
1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended
1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Continental VanContact Winter Rating: Recommended | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,8 | 3,1 | 3,0 | 2,2 |
Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 4,0 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,7 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
Show test details |