Segment
1. Kumho PorTran KC53 Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental VanContact A/S vs. Kumho PorTran KC53
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Continental allround tyres are slightly better rated (74%) than Kumho (65%). But when it comes to comparing Continental VanContact A/S and Kumho PorTran KC53, the rating is the same - 0%. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Continental VanContact A/S has A wet grip rating, whereas 71% of Kumho PorTran KC53 has C rating.
| # | Continental VanContact A/S
| Kumho PorTran KC53
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
