In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone allround tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Continental (73%). But when it comes to comparing Continental VanContact 4Season and Bridgestone Duravis All Season, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Continental VanContact 4Season was done in 2020, compared to 2022 when was the Bridgestone Duravis All Season first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 225/75 R16 test, where both the VanContact 4Season and the Duravis All Season were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 97% of Continental VanContact 4Season dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (96%) of the Bridgestone Duravis All Season also have A wet ratings.
| # | Continental VanContact 4Season
| Bridgestone Duravis All Season
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R15 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental VanContact 4Season Exemplary2. Bridgestone Duravis All Season Conditionally recommended
1. Continental VanContact 4Season Recommended2. Bridgestone Duravis All Season Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continental VanContact 4Season Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Bridgestone Duravis All Season Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||