Segment
1. Continental VanContact 200 Premium2. Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Maxxis). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Maxxis (59%). But when it comes to comparing Continental VanContact 200 and Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the VanContact 200 and the Vansmart MCV3+ were tested.
| # | Continental VanContact 200
| Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental VanContact 200 Premium2. Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Lowcost
1. Continental VanContact 200 Satisfactory2. Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Sufficient
1. Continental VanContact 200 Satisfactory2. Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Continental VanContact 200 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 3,4 | 3,1 | 1,5 | 1,8 | ||
| Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Rating: Sufficient | 3,7 | 2,2 | 3,0 | 0,5 | 2,3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||