Segment
1. Continental VanContact 200 Premium2. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Premium3. Pirelli CARRIER Premium4. Kumho PorTran KC53 Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental VanContact 200 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo vs. Pirelli CARRIER vs. Kumho PorTran KC53
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental VanContact 200 Satisfactory2. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Satisfactory3. Pirelli CARRIER Satisfactory4. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Continental VanContact 200 Satisfactory2. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Satisfactory3. Pirelli CARRIER Satisfactory4. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Continental VanContact 200 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 3,4 | 3,1 | 1,5 | 1,8 | ||
| GoodYear Efficientgrip Cargo Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 0,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Pirelli CARRIER Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,8 | 3,1 | 1,0 | 2,1 | ||
| Kumho PorTran KC53 Rating: Sufficient | 3,8 | 3,2 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
