Segment
1. Continental VanContact 200 Premium2. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Goodyear (74%). But when it comes to comparing Continental VanContact 200 and Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the VanContact 200 and the Efficientgrip Cargo were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 77% of Continental VanContact 200 has A wet grip rating, whereas 76% of Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo has B rating.
| # | Continental VanContact 200
| Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental VanContact 200 Premium2. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Premium
1. Continental VanContact 200 Satisfactory2. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Satisfactory
1. Continental VanContact 200 Satisfactory2. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Continental VanContact 200 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 3,4 | 3,1 | 1,5 | 1,8 | ||
| GoodYear Efficientgrip Cargo Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 0,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||