Segment
1. Continental VanContact 200 Premium2. Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Continental VanContact 200 vs. Fulda Conveo Tour 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Germany. Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Fulda (68%). But when it comes to comparing Continental VanContact 200 and Fulda Conveo Tour 2, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the VanContact 200 and the Conveo Tour 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 77% of Continental VanContact 200 has A wet grip rating, whereas 50% of Fulda Conveo Tour 2 has C rating.
| # | Continental VanContact 200
| Fulda Conveo Tour 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R14 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental VanContact 200 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Continental VanContact 200 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Continental VanContact 200 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 3,4 | 3,1 | 1,5 | 1,8 | ||
| Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Rating: Poor | 5,0 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 0,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
