Segment
1. Continental VanContact 200 Premium2. Apollo Altrust Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Apollo (29%). But when it comes to comparing Continental VanContact 200 and Apollo Altrust, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the VanContact 200 and the Altrust were tested.
| # | Continental VanContact 200
| Apollo Altrust
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R15 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental VanContact 200 Premium2. Apollo Altrust Lowcost
1. Apollo Altrust Satisfactory2. Continental VanContact 200 Satisfactory
1. Apollo Altrust Satisfactory2. Continental VanContact 200 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Continental VanContact 200 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 3,4 | 3,1 | 1,5 | 1,8 | ||
| Apollo Altrust Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,4 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||