Segment
1. Continental SportContact 7 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Kumho (56%). In this particular case, the Continental SportContact 7 has a better rating of 100% compared to 76% of the Kumho Ecsta PS71. The first tyre test of Continental SportContact 7 was done in 2022, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the SportContact 7 and the Ecsta PS71 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 92% of Continental SportContact 7 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (72%) of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 also have A wet ratings. We also know where SportContact 7 is made - Czech Republic/Slovakia/Portugal.
# | Continental SportContact 7
| Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R18 - R24 | R16 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental SportContact 7 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended2. Continental SportContact 7 Outstanding
2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,5 | |||||
Continental SportContact 7 Rating: Good | 2,4 | 1,5 | |||||
Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 2,9 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
Continental SportContact 7 Rating: Test winner | 1 | ||||||
Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 1 | ||||||
Show test details |