Segment
1. Continental SportContact 6 Premium2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Hankook (77%). The first tyre test of Continental SportContact 6 was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 265/35 R20 test, where both the SportContact 6 and the Ventus S1 evo3 K127 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 86% of Continental SportContact 6 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (86%) of the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Continental SportContact 6
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R23 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental SportContact 6 Premium2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Exemplary2. Continental SportContact 6 Exemplary
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | |||||
| Continental SportContact 6 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||