Segment
1. Continental SportContact 5P Premium2. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Premium3. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium4. Nokian zLine Upper-middle5. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental SportContact 5P vs. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 vs. Nokian zLine vs. Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS91
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
5. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
4. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Exemplary2. Nokian zLine Recommended3. Continental SportContact 5P Recommended4. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory5. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Recommended3. Continental SportContact 5P Recommended4. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended5. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,3 | 6 | 7,6 | 7 | |||
| Continental SportContact 5P Rating: Recommended | 8,8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | |||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Recommended | 8,8 | 8,9 | 8,8 | 7,9 | |||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Recommended | 8,2 | 8,4 | 8 | 8,4 | |||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,5 | 7,6 | 7,6 | 7 | |||
| Kumho Ecsta PS91 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,5 | 6 | 8,8 | 7,3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
