Segment
2. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Vredestein (34%). But when it comes to comparing Continental SportContact 5 SUV and Vredestein Ultrac Satin, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Continental SportContact 5 SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Vredestein Ultrac Satin first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Gute-Fahrt 2020 215/50 R18 test, where both the SportContact 5 SUV and the Ultrac Satin were tested.
| # | Continental SportContact 5 SUV
| Vredestein Ultrac Satin
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R22 | R16 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Premium
1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV Exemplary2. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Highly recommended
1. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Still recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Comfort | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Continental SportContact 5 SUV Rating: Very good | 1.5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Vredestein Ultrac Satin Rating: Good - | 2.3 | 2.7 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||