Segment
2. Hankook Ventus ST RH06 Premium3. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle4. Apollo Apterra H/T2 Lowcost
Comparison: Continental SportContact 5 SUV vs. Hankook Ventus ST RH06 vs. Kumho Crugen HP91 vs. Apollo Apterra H/T2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV Exemplary2. Hankook Ventus ST RH06 Exemplary3. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory4. Apollo Apterra H/T2 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory2. Apollo Apterra H/T2 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continental SportContact 5 SUV Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Hankook Ventus ST RH06 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Kumho Crugen HP91 Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Apollo Apterra H/T2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
