Segment
2. Apollo Apterra H/T2 Lowcost
Comparison: Continental SportContact 5 SUV vs. Apollo Apterra H/T2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Apollo (29%). But when it comes to comparing Continental SportContact 5 SUV and Apollo Apterra H/T2, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Continental SportContact 5 SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Apollo Apterra H/T2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 265/60 R18 test, where both the SportContact 5 SUV and the Apterra H/T2 were tested.
| # | Continental SportContact 5 SUV
| Apollo Apterra H/T2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R22 | R16 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV Exemplary2. Apollo Apterra H/T2 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Apterra H/T2 Conditionally recommended
Offroad
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continental SportContact 5 SUV Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Apollo Apterra H/T2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
