Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium2. Nokian Powerproof 2 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Nokian (61%). In this particular case, the Continental PremiumContact 7 has a better rating of 98% compared to 72% of the Nokian Powerproof 2. The first tyre test of Continental PremiumContact 7 was done in 2023, compared to 2026 when was the Nokian Powerproof 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2026 245/45 R19 test, where both the PremiumContact 7 and the Powerproof 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Continental PremiumContact 7 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian Powerproof 2 also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the PremiumContact 7 is made in France/Slovakia/Germany/Czech Republic and Powerproof 2 is made in Finland.
| # | Continental PremiumContact 7
| Nokian Powerproof 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium2. Nokian Powerproof 2 Upper-middle
1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Test winner2. Nokian Powerproof 2 Recommended
2. Nokian Powerproof 2 Recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.8 | 25.2 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 | 34.3 | 27.3 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof 2 | 34.4 | 28.1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||