Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Falken Azenis FK510
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Falken (70%). The first tyre test of Continental PremiumContact 7 was done in 2023, compared to 2016 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Continental PremiumContact 7 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (69%) of the Falken Azenis FK510 also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the PremiumContact 7 is made in France/Slovakia/Germany/Czech Republic and Azenis FK510 is made in Japan/Turkey.
| # | Continental PremiumContact 7
| Falken Azenis FK510
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary2. Continental PremiumContact 7 Test winner
Worst rating in test
2. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet side guide
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Dry lane changing
Dry steering response
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
