Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Viking ProTech HP Lowcost
Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Viking ProTech HP
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Viking). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Viking (28%). The first tyre test of Continental PremiumContact 6 was done in 2017, compared to 2020 when was the Viking ProTech HP first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the PremiumContact 6 and the ProTech HP were tested. We also know where PremiumContact 6 is made - Slovakia/Germany/Czech Republic.
| # | Continental PremiumContact 6
| Viking ProTech HP
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet side guide
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry driving behavior
Dry steering response
Dry lane changing
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 33,2 | 30,2 | |||||
| Viking ProTech HP | 37,3 | 34,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
