Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2
Table of contents:
| # | Continental PremiumContact 6
| Sava Intensa UHP 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
When comparing two summer tyres, the Continental PremiumContact 6 and the Sava Intensa UHP 2, there are a few key points to note.
The Continental PremiumContact 6, rated at 87%, is known as a touring tyne that was manufactured in SK, DE, and CZ. It is a newer model replacing the Continental PremiumContact 5. In Promobil's test, it scored 2nd out of 8 tyres and landed in the 1st position in both the ADAC and Autobild tests. Key factors contributing to this were wet circle cornering, wet handling, wet braking, mileage, dry handling, and good price/value. Remarkably, it was assessed to have"Keine besonderen Schwächen" meaning no particular weaknesses.
Moving onto the Sava Intensa UHP 2, rated at 73%, is endeared for its noise reduction, aquaplaning - cross, fuel efficiency, and mileage. However, it holds the 8th position in Promobil's test out of 8 tyres, 6th place in the ADAC test out of 16 tyres, and 11th place in the Autobild competition among 52 tyres. It was praised for its good performance on dry road, relatively low exterior noise but criticized for "Leicht erhöhter Verschleiß, Schwächen auf Nässe (Abwertung)" pointing out slight increased wear and performance deficiencies on wet surface.
In evaluated data from all the tests, the Continental PremiumContact 6 wins overall with higher ratings, and better test positions. However, Sava Intensa UHP 2 tyre is still a commendable choice, especially considering its performance on dry road and quieter ride.
More about these tires can be found at their manufactures's sites here: Continental Tyres and Sava Tyres.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 13.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet performance
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry driving behavior
Dry performance
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 8 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
8
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 7,3 | 7,7 | 5,9 | ||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Recommended | 8,9 | 8,3 | 8,6 | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Still recommended | 7,3 | 8,0 | 8,4 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | |||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 2,1 | 3,1 | 2,0 | |||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,0 | 2,6 | 2,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 33,2 | 30,2 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 34,7 | 35,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Good | 1,7 | 2,4 | 3,6 | 2,0 | 2,1 | ||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,8 | 3,1 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Good | 2- | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 35,8 | 29,9 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35,7 | 32,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 34,9 | 35 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35,3 | 38,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
