• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Nokian Wetproof SUV

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Nokian (62%). In this particular case, the Continental PremiumContact 6 has a better rating of 78% compared to 55% of the Nokian Wetproof SUV. The first tyre test of Continental PremiumContact 6 was done in 2017, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian Wetproof SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Promobil 2022 235/55 R17 test, where both the PremiumContact 6 and the Wetproof SUV were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 84% of Continental PremiumContact 6 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian Wetproof SUV also have A wet ratings. We also know where PremiumContact 6 is made - Slovakia/Germany/Czech Republic.

# Continental PremiumContact 6
/78%
Nokian Wetproof SUV
/55%

Add to comparison

Continental
Nokian
DimensionsR15 - R22 R16 - R19
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Promobil
Name WetDryEnviromental impact
Best values in test7,37,75,9
Continental PremiumContact 6
Rating: Recommended
8,98,38,6
Nokian WetProof SUV
Rating: Recommended
8,07,97,3
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDryOffroad
Best values in test2+2+2+
Continental PremiumContact 6
Rating: Good
2+ 2+ 2-
Nokian WetProof SUV
Rating: Good
22-2+
Show test details