Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Nokian Line SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Nokian (61%). The first tyre test of Continental PremiumContact 6 was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Nokian Line SUV first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 82% of Continental PremiumContact 6 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (63%) of the Nokian Line SUV also have A wet ratings. We also know where PremiumContact 6 is made - Slovakia/Germany/Czech Republic.
| # | Continental PremiumContact 6
| Nokian Line SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Nokian Line SUV Good
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line SUV Good2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended
