18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Kumho Crugen HP91 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Satin vs. Nokian Line SUV vs. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Continental PremiumContact 6 /76%	Kumho Crugen HP91 /0%	Vredestein Ultrac Satin /0%	Nokian Line SUV /0%	Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 /0%

Dimensions	R15 - R22	R16 - R22	R16 - R20	R15 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium

2. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Premium

3. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Premium

4. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle

5. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 296

2. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 70

3. Kumho Crugen HP91 50

4. Nokian Line SUV 33

5. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 0

Number of tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 12x

3. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 5x

4. Nokian Line SUV 5x

5. Kumho Crugen HP91 2x

Best position in test

1. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 1.

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

3. Nokian Line SUV 2.

4. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 3.

5. Kumho Crugen HP91 5.

Worst position in test

1. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 3.

2. Nokian Line SUV 5.

3. Kumho Crugen HP91 8.

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

5. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 12.

Average position in tests

1. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 2

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

3. Nokian Line SUV 4.2

4. Kumho Crugen HP91 6.5

5. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 7.75

Year of the last test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

2. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 2021

3. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 2018

4. Kumho Crugen HP91 2018

5. Nokian Line SUV 2017

Best rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary

2. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Highly recommended

3. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Very good

4. Nokian Line SUV Good

5. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Nokian Line SUV Good

2. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Recommended

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended

4. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory

5. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Still recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

87%

Kumho
Crugen HP91

86%

Nokian
Line SUV

83%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

83%

Vredestein
Ultrac Satin

74%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Kumho Crugen HP91 93%

2. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 91%

3. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 85%

4. Nokian Line SUV 82%

5. Continental PremiumContact 6 79%

Wet braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 89%

3. Kumho Crugen HP91 88%

4. Nokian Line SUV 77%

5. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 72%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 86%

2. Nokian Line SUV 81%

3. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 75%

4. Kumho Crugen HP91 75%

5. Continental PremiumContact 6 68%

Wet handling

1. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 99%

2. Kumho Crugen HP91 92%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

4. Nokian Line SUV 84%

5. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 82%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. Kumho Crugen HP91 83%

3. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 79%

4. Nokian Line SUV 78%

5. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 75%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

2. Nokian Line SUV A

3. Kumho Crugen HP91 B

4. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 ?

5. Vredestein Ultrac Satin ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

88%

Goodyear
EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

84%

Nokian
Line SUV

82%

Kumho
Crugen HP91

82%

Vredestein
Ultrac Satin

79%

Dry braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

2. Nokian Line SUV 78%

3. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 73%

4. Kumho Crugen HP91 69%

5. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 68%

Dry handling

1. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 100%

2. Kumho Crugen HP91 95%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

4. Nokian Line SUV 87%

5. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 86%

Dry driving behavior

1. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 87%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 81%

3. Nokian Line SUV 81%

4. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 0%

5. Kumho Crugen HP91 0%

Dry steering response

1. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 93%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

3. Nokian Line SUV 0%

4. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 0%

5. Kumho Crugen HP91 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Kumho
Crugen HP91

96%

Vredestein
Ultrac Satin

83%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

77%

Nokian
Line SUV

72%

Goodyear
EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

52%

Exterior noise

1. Kumho Crugen HP91 96%

2. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 87%

3. Nokian Line SUV 70%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

5. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 52%

Comfort

1. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 80%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 71%

3. Kumho Crugen HP91 0%

4. Nokian Line SUV 0%

5. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Vredestein Ultrac Satin ?

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

3. Kumho Crugen HP91 ?

4. Nokian Line SUV ?

5. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 ?

Offroad

(Overall rating)

Kumho
Crugen HP91

92%

Goodyear
EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

85%

Vredestein
Ultrac Satin

79%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

76%

Nokian
Line SUV

0%

Gravel traction

1. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 91%

2. Kumho Crugen HP91 88%

3. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 80%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 65%

5. Nokian Line SUV 0%

Grass traction

1. Kumho Crugen HP91 83%

2. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 80%

3. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 81%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 71%

5. Nokian Line SUV 0%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

81%

Nokian
Line SUV

68%

Kumho
Crugen HP91

64%

Vredestein
Ultrac Satin

64%

Goodyear
EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

56%

Rolling resistance

1. Nokian Line SUV 78%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 75%

3. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 68%

4. Kumho Crugen HP91 64%

5. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 56%

Mileage

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 85%

2. Nokian Line SUV 60%

3. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 0%

4. Kumho Crugen HP91 0%

5. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 0%

Fuel efficiency

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 83%

2. Nokian Line SUV 66%

3. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 60%

4. Kumho Crugen HP91 0%

5. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

2. Nokian Line SUV C

3. Kumho Crugen HP91 E

4. Vredestein Ultrac Satin ?

5. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Summer tyre test 2017 235/50 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Offroad
Best values in test	1-	2+	2+
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Recommended	2	1-	2
Kumho Crugen HP91 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2
Vredestein Ultrac Satin Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2-
Show test details

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Kumho Crugen HP91 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Satin vs. Nokian Line SUV vs. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands