12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Hankook (81%). In this particular case, the Continental PremiumContact 6 has a better rating of 76% compared to 72% of the Hankook Ventus Prime 4. The first tyre test of Continental PremiumContact 6 was done in 2017, compared to 2022 when was the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the PremiumContact 6 and the Ventus Prime 4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 82% of Continental PremiumContact 6 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (53%) of the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 also have A wet ratings. We also know where PremiumContact 6 is made - Slovakia/Germany/Czech Republic.

#	Continental PremiumContact 6 /76%	Hankook Ventus Prime 4 /72%

Dimensions	R15 - R22	R13 - R23
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium

Number of sizes available

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 530

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 296

Number of tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 12x

Best position in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2.

Worst position in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 9.

Average position in tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 5.75

Year of the last test

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2025

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

Best rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary

Worst rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

83%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

73%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 79%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 71%

Wet braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 76%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 68%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 59%

Wet handling

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 77%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 80%

Wet side guide

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 74%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Wet performance

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 90%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 A

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

88%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

81%

Dry braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 83%

Dry handling

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 79%

Dry driving behavior

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 81%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Dry steering response

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Dry lane changing

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 95%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Dry performance

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 78%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

77%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

75%

Exterior noise

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 75%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

Comfort

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 100%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 72%

Interior noise

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 80%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 73%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 ?

Offroad

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

76%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

74%

Mud traction

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 67%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

Sand traction

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 86%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 82%

Grass traction

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 71%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 61%

Handling on gravel

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 93%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 82%

Gravel traction

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 78%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 65%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

81%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

79%

Rolling resistance

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 78%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 75%

Mileage

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 85%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 70%

Fuel efficiency

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 83%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Price/value

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 90%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 81%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 C

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

ADAC Summer tyre test 2023 205/55 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	1,3	1,8
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Good	2,6	1,8
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Rating: Good	2,7	2,4
Show test details

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands