18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Continental PremiumContact 6 /76%	General Tire Grabber GT Plus /43%	Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV /93%

Dimensions	R15 - R22	R15 - R23	R17 - R23
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Premium

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 296

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 137

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64

Number of tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 7x

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2x

Best position in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 1.

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

Worst position in test

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 6.

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

Average position in tests

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 2.43

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9

Year of the last test

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 2025

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2023

Best rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Exemplary

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Good

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 SUV

88%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

83%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

67%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 94%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 79%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 68%

Wet braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 90%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 92%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 68%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

Wet handling

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 87%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 61%

Wet circle cornering

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 91%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 62%

Wet side guide

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 80%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 74%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV A

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus A

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

88%

Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 SUV

86%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

Dry braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 84%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 74%

Dry handling

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 91%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 53%

Dry driving behavior

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 81%

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 0%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Dry lane changing

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 95%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 95%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Dry steering response

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 80%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

77%

Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 SUV

65%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

63%

Exterior noise

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 72%

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 71%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

Comfort

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 100%

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 72%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 60%

Interior noise

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 80%

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 0%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 72 dB

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus ?

Offroad

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 SUV

80%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

76%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

74%

Gravel traction

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 87%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 65%

Mud traction

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 80%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 73%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

Sand traction

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 86%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 83%

3. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 72%

Grass traction

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 85%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 71%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

Handling on gravel

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 93%

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 77%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 70%

Costs

(Overall rating)

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

81%

Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 SUV

63%

Rolling resistance

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 88%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 75%

3. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 66%

Mileage

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 85%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

3. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 0%

Fuel efficiency

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 83%

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 60%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV C

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus C

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands