18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Gripmax Stature H/T

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Continental PremiumContact 6 /76%	General Tire Grabber GT Plus /43%	Gripmax Stature H/T /0%

Dimensions	R15 - R22	R15 - R23	R16 - R23
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Lowcost

3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?

Number of sizes available

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 296

2. Gripmax Stature H/T 69

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64

Number of tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2x

3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?

Best position in test

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?

Worst position in test

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?

Average position in tests

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?

Year of the last test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2023

3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?

Best rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory

3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?

Worst rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory

3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

83%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

67%

Gripmax
Stature H/T

46%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 79%

2. Gripmax Stature H/T 75%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 68%

Wet braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

3. Gripmax Stature H/T 23%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 68%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

3. Gripmax Stature H/T 3%

Wet handling

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. Gripmax Stature H/T 82%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 61%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 62%

3. Gripmax Stature H/T 0%

Wet side guide

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 74%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

3. Gripmax Stature H/T 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus A

3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

88%

Gripmax
Stature H/T

86%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

Dry braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 74%

3. Gripmax Stature H/T 73%

Dry handling

1. Gripmax Stature H/T 98%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 53%

Dry driving behavior

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 81%

2. Gripmax Stature H/T 0%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Dry lane changing

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 95%

2. Gripmax Stature H/T 0%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Dry steering response

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. Gripmax Stature H/T 0%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Gripmax
Stature H/T

99%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

77%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

63%

Exterior noise

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 72%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

3. Gripmax Stature H/T 0%

Comfort

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 71%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 56%

3. Gripmax Stature H/T 0%

Interior noise

1. Gripmax Stature H/T 99%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 80%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Gripmax Stature H/T ?

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus ?

Offroad

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

76%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

74%

Gripmax
Stature H/T

0%

Grass traction

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 71%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

3. Gripmax Stature H/T 0%

Handling on gravel

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 93%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 70%

3. Gripmax Stature H/T 0%

Gravel traction

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 65%

3. Gripmax Stature H/T 0%

Mud traction

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 73%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

3. Gripmax Stature H/T 0%

Sand traction

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 86%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 83%

3. Gripmax Stature H/T 0%

Costs

(Overall rating)

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

81%

Gripmax
Stature H/T

79%

Rolling resistance

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 88%

2. Gripmax Stature H/T 79%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 75%

Mileage

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 85%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

3. Gripmax Stature H/T 0%

Fuel efficiency

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 83%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

3. Gripmax Stature H/T 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus C

3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Gripmax Stature H/T

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands