18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Continental PremiumContact 6 /76%	General Tire Grabber GT Plus /43%	Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport /37%	GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV /0%

Dimensions	R15 - R22	R15 - R23	R16 - R21	R16 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Upper-middle

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Lowcost

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Number of sizes available

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 296

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 146

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 123

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64

Number of tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 5x

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Best position in test

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 2.

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Worst position in test

1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 29.

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Average position in tests

1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 11.6

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Year of the last test

1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 2026

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2023

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 2018

Best rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Good

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Worst rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Conditionally recommended

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

83%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

80%

Cooper
Zeon 4XS Sport

68%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

67%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 87%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 79%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 68%

4. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 64%

Wet braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 89%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

4. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 63%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 71%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 68%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

4. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 55%

Wet handling

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 89%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 72%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 61%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 86%

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 76%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 62%

Wet side guide

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 74%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 0%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport A

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus A

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV B

Dry

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

88%

Cooper
Zeon 4XS Sport

79%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

Dry braking

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 92%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 77%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 74%

Dry handling

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 93%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 83%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 53%

Dry driving behavior

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 84%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 81%

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 81%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Dry steering response

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 0%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Dry lane changing

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 95%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 0%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

78%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

77%

Cooper
Zeon 4XS Sport

70%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

63%

Exterior noise

1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 73%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 72%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 70%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

Comfort

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 71%

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 64%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 56%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

Interior noise

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 86%

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 81%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 80%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 69 dB

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus ?

Offroad

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

76%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

74%

Cooper
Zeon 4XS Sport

69%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

0%

Sand traction

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 86%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 83%

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 71%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

Grass traction

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 71%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 54%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

Handling on gravel

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 93%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 70%

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 70%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

Gravel traction

1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 87%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 65%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

Mud traction

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 73%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 63%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

Costs

(Overall rating)

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

81%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

78%

Cooper
Zeon 4XS Sport

69%

Rolling resistance

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 88%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 88%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 75%

4. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 69%

Mileage

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 85%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 70%

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 60%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Fuel efficiency

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 83%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 77%

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 77%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV C

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport C

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus C

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands