18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Continental PremiumContact 6 /76%	General Tire Grabber GT Plus /43%	Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport /37%

Dimensions	R15 - R22	R15 - R23	R16 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Upper-middle

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 296

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 146

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64

Number of tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 5x

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2x

Best position in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 2.

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

Worst position in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 29.

Average position in tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 11.6

Year of the last test

1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 2026

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2023

Best rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Good

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

83%

Cooper
Zeon 4XS Sport

68%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

67%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 79%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 68%

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 64%

Wet braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 63%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 68%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 55%

Wet handling

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 72%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 61%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 76%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 62%

Wet side guide

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 74%

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 0%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport A

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus A

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

88%

Cooper
Zeon 4XS Sport

79%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

Dry braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 77%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 74%

Dry handling

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 83%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 53%

Dry driving behavior

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 81%

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 81%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Dry steering response

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 0%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Dry lane changing

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 95%

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 0%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

77%

Cooper
Zeon 4XS Sport

70%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

63%

Exterior noise

1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 73%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 72%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

Comfort

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 71%

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 64%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 56%

Interior noise

1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 81%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 80%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 69 dB

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus ?

Offroad

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

76%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

74%

Cooper
Zeon 4XS Sport

69%

Mud traction

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 73%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 63%

Sand traction

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 86%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 83%

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 71%

Grass traction

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 71%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 54%

Handling on gravel

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 93%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 70%

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 70%

Gravel traction

1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 87%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 65%

Costs

(Overall rating)

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

81%

Cooper
Zeon 4XS Sport

69%

Rolling resistance

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 88%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 75%

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 69%

Mileage

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 85%

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 60%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Fuel efficiency

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 83%

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 77%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport C

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus C

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands