18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Continental SportContact 5 SUV

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Continental PremiumContact 6 /76%	General Tire Grabber GT Plus /43%	Continental SportContact 5 SUV /0%

Dimensions	R15 - R22	R15 - R23	R18 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium

2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV Premium

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 296

2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 93

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64

Number of tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 3x

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2x

Best position in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 1.

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

Worst position in test

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 2.

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

Average position in tests

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 1.33

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9

Year of the last test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2023

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 2020

Best rating in test

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV Exemplary

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV ?

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
SportContact 5 SUV

87%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

83%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

67%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 91%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 79%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 68%

Wet braking

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 98%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 68%

2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 66%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

Wet handling

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 100%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 61%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 79%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 62%

Wet side guide

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 74%

2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 0%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV A

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus A

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
SportContact 5 SUV

100%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

88%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

Dry braking

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 100%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 74%

Dry handling

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 99%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 53%

Dry driving behavior

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 81%

2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 0%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Dry lane changing

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 95%

2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 0%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Dry steering response

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 0%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

77%

Continental
SportContact 5 SUV

64%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

63%

Exterior noise

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 72%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 64%

Comfort

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 71%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 56%

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 0%

Interior noise

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 80%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus ?

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV ?

Offroad

(Overall rating)

Continental
SportContact 5 SUV

86%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

76%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

74%

Mud traction

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 73%

2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 68%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

Sand traction

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 91%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 86%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 83%

Grass traction

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 79%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 71%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

Handling on gravel

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 100%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 93%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 70%

Gravel traction

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 92%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 65%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
SportContact 5 SUV

96%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

81%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 96%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 88%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 75%

Mileage

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 85%

2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 0%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Fuel efficiency

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 83%

2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 0%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV C

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus C

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Continental SportContact 5 SUV

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands