18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Continental SportContact 5 SUV

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Continental PremiumContact 6 /76%	General Tire Grabber GT Plus /43%	Bridgestone Turanza T005 /88%	Continental SportContact 5 SUV /0%

Dimensions	R15 - R22	R15 - R23	R14 - R23	R18 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV Premium

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 658

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 296

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 93

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64

Number of tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 33x

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 3x

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2x

Best position in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 1.

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 1.

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

Worst position in test

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 2.

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 11.

Average position in tests

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 1.33

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 4.09

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 2025

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2023

4. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 2020

Best rating in test

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV Exemplary

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Good

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory

4. Continental SportContact 5 SUV ?

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
SportContact 5 SUV

87%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

83%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

81%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

67%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 91%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 79%

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 78%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 68%

Wet braking

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 98%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 78%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 73%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 68%

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 66%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

Wet handling

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 100%

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 87%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 61%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 85%

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 79%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 62%

Wet side guide

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 84%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 74%

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 0%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Wet performance

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 90%

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 82%

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 0%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 A

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV A

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus A

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
SportContact 5 SUV

100%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

88%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

83%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

Dry braking

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 100%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 87%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 74%

Dry handling

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 99%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 87%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 53%

Dry driving behavior

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 85%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 81%

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 0%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Dry steering response

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 82%

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 0%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Dry lane changing

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 95%

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 84%

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 0%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Dry performance

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 83%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 78%

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 0%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

77%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

73%

Continental
SportContact 5 SUV

64%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

63%

Exterior noise

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 72%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 64%

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 62%

Comfort

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 100%

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 81%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 60%

4. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 0%

Interior noise

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 83%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 80%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

4. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 ?

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus ?

4. Continental SportContact 5 SUV ?

Offroad

(Overall rating)

Continental
SportContact 5 SUV

86%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

82%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

76%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

74%

Sand traction

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 91%

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 86%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 86%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 83%

Grass traction

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 79%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 71%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 63%

Handling on gravel

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 100%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 93%

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 91%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 70%

Gravel traction

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 92%

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 85%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 65%

Mud traction

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 85%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 73%

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 68%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
SportContact 5 SUV

96%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

81%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

75%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 96%

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 93%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 88%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 75%

Mileage

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 85%

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 69%

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 0%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Fuel efficiency

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 86%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 83%

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 0%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Price/value

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 81%

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 53%

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 0%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 B

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV C

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus C

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Continental SportContact 5 SUV

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands