18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Continental PremiumContact 6 /76%	Firestone Roadhawk 2 /77%	General Tire Grabber GT Plus /43%	GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV /0%

Dimensions	R15 - R22	R16 - R22	R15 - R23	R16 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Upper-middle

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Lowcost

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Number of sizes available

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 296

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 136

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 123

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64

Number of tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 5x

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Best position in test

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 3.

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Worst position in test

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 6.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Average position in tests

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 4.8

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Year of the last test

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 2026

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2023

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 2018

Best rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Highly recommended

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Worst rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Satisfactory

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

83%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

83%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

80%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

67%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 95%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 87%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 79%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 68%

Wet braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 89%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 78%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 88%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 71%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 68%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

Wet handling

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 88%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 89%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 61%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 86%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 84%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 62%

Wet side guide

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 74%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 A

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus A

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV B

Dry

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

88%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

74%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

Dry braking

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 92%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 81%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 74%

Dry handling

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 93%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 77%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 53%

Dry driving behavior

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 84%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 81%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Dry lane changing

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 95%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 93%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Dry steering response

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

78%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

77%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

77%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

63%

Exterior noise

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 72%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 70%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 66%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

Comfort

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 100%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 71%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 60%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

Interior noise

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 86%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 80%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 ?

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus ?

Offroad

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

76%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

74%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

0%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

0%

Costs

(Overall rating)

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

81%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

78%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

61%

Rolling resistance

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 88%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 88%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 85%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 75%

Mileage

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 85%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 70%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 38%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Fuel efficiency

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 83%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 77%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 B

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV C

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus C

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands