12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Continental PremiumContact 6 /76%	Firestone Roadhawk 2 /74%	General Tire Grabber GT Plus /43%

Dimensions	R15 - R22	R16 - R22	R15 - R23
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Upper-middle

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 296

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 136

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64

Number of tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 3x

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2x

Best position in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 5.

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

Worst position in test

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 6.

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

Average position in tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 5.67

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9

Year of the last test

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 2025

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2023

Best rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Highly recommended

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

85%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

83%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

67%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 95%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 79%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 68%

Wet braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 78%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 88%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 68%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

Wet handling

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 88%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 61%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 84%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 62%

Wet side guide

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 74%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 A

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus A

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

88%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

79%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

Dry braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 81%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 74%

Dry handling

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 77%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 53%

Dry driving behavior

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 81%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Dry lane changing

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 95%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 93%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Dry steering response

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

77%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

77%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

63%

Exterior noise

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 72%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 66%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

Comfort

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 100%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 71%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 60%

Interior noise

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 80%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 ?

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus ?

Offroad

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

76%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

74%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

0%

Grass traction

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 71%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

Handling on gravel

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 93%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 70%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

Gravel traction

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 65%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

Mud traction

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 73%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

Sand traction

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 86%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 83%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

Costs

(Overall rating)

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

81%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

61%

Rolling resistance

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 88%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 85%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 75%

Mileage

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 85%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 38%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Fuel efficiency

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 83%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Price/value

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 81%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 60%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 B

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus C

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands