Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 5 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 5 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Kumho (58%). The first tyre test of Continental PremiumContact 5 was done in 2019, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 70% of Continental PremiumContact 5 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (75%) of the Kumho Ecsta HS52 also have A wet ratings. We also know where PremiumContact 5 is made - Czech Republic.
| # | Continental PremiumContact 5
| Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Continental PremiumContact 5 Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Continental PremiumContact 5 Recommended
