Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 5 Premium3. Michelin Primacy 5 Premium4. Michelin e.Primacy Premium5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 5 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Exemplary2. Michelin Primacy 5 Test winner3. Michelin e.Primacy Very good4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good5. Continental PremiumContact 5 Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Continental PremiumContact 5 Recommended3. Michelin Primacy 5 Recommended4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Satisfactory5. Michelin e.Primacy Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 8,9 | 8,9 | 8,7 | 10 | 10 | ||
| Continental PremiumContact 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 7,9 | 8,0 | 7,8 | 7 | 8 | ||
| Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 7,9 | 7,8 | 8,1 | 8 | 7 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
