Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 5 Premium2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium3. Michelin Primacy 5 Premium4. Pirelli Cinturato P7 Premium5. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium6. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 5 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Pirelli Cinturato P7 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary3. Pirelli Cinturato P7 Highly recommended4. Michelin Primacy 5 Test winner5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good6. Continental PremiumContact 5 Recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good3. Continental PremiumContact 5 Recommended4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended5. Pirelli Cinturato P7 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 8,9 | 8,9 | 8,7 | 10 | 10 | ||
| Continental PremiumContact 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 7,9 | 8,0 | 7,8 | 7 | 8 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 8,1 | 8,1 | 8,0 | 10 | 6 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 8,8 | 9,1 | 9,3 | 9,7 | |||
| Continental PremiumContact 5 Rating: Recommended | 8,1 | 9,1 | 7,2 | 6,6 | |||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Recommended | 8,6 | 8,4 | 8,7 | 9,4 | |||
| Pirelli Cinturato P7 Rating: Recommended | 8,3 | 8,6 | 8,3 | 7,3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
