• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Kumho (56%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has a better rating of 73% compared to 48% of the Continental EcoContact 6. The first tyre test of Continental EcoContact 6 was done in 2020, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the EcoContact 6 and the Ecsta HS52 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 50% of Continental EcoContact 6 has B wet grip rating, whereas 77% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 has A rating. We also know where EcoContact 6 is made - Germany.

# Continental EcoContact 6
/48%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
/73%

Add to comparison

Continental
Kumho
DimensionsR13 - R22 R14 - R18
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test12+1+
Continental EcoContact 6
Rating: Satisfactory
2-23+
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Rating: Good
222
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,727,5
Continental EcoContact 636,432,7
Kumho Ecsta HS5235,7 28,6
Show test details