In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Hankook (77%). The first tyre test of Continental EcoContact 6 was done in 2020, compared to 2022 when was the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the EcoContact 6 and the Ventus Prime 4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 54% of Continental EcoContact 6 has B wet grip rating, whereas 53% of Hankook Ventus Prime 4 has A rating. We also know where EcoContact 6 is made - Germany.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autobild
|
Summer
|
2022 | 215/55 R17 | View |
Continental EcoContact 6
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Continental EcoContact 6
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Continental EcoContact 6
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Continental EcoContact 6
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Continental EcoContact 6
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Continental EcoContact 6
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Continental EcoContact 6
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Continental EcoContact 6
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Continental EcoContact 6
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Continental EcoContact 6
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Continental EcoContact 6
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.