Segment
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Debica Presto UHP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Debica (56%). But when it comes to comparing Continental EcoContact 6 and Debica Presto UHP2, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Continental EcoContact 6 was done in 2020, compared to 2022 when was the Debica Presto UHP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the EcoContact 6 and the Presto UHP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 55% of Continental EcoContact 6 has B wet grip rating, whereas 67% of Debica Presto UHP2 has A rating. We also know where EcoContact 6 is made - Germany.
| # | Continental EcoContact 6
| Debica Presto UHP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R24 | R17 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Debica Presto UHP2 Lowcost
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory2. Debica Presto UHP2 Satisfactory
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory2. Debica Presto UHP2 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Continental EcoContact 6 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Debica Presto UHP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Continental EcoContact 6 | 36,4 | 32,7 | |||||
| Debica Presto UHP2 | 36,5 | 29,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||