Segment
2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Nokian (60%). The first tyre test of Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P was done in 2015, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof P first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 63% of Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian WR Snowproof P has B rating.
| # | Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P
| Nokian WR Snowproof P
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Recommended2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow cornering
Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
